We find no parallel in Rodriguez (supra) to the instant case: the Court of Appeals found no evidence of "special elevation risks" attendant to the circumstances in which the worker was injured, i.e., while placing a 120-pound beam upon the ground from a location seven inches above his head, with the assistance of three other workers. for Nursing Care ( 84 N.Y.2d 841), as do defendants on appeal. In denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment against Reilly Homes and Chelsea Homes, and in granting both of these defendants summary judgment against plaintiffs dismissing their Labor Law ยง 240 (1) claims, Supreme Court relied upon the Court of Appeals' holding in Rodriguez v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |